1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2010 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Saab 03-Sep has automatic transmission and 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Saab 03-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Saab |
Model | 6C | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4689 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1529 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2675 mm |