1951 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 14 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lotus |
Model | 6C | Evora |
Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2575 mm |