1951 Allard J1 vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1951 Allard J1 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard J1 (100 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard J1 should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 312 kg more than 1951 Allard J1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard J1 | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Allard | Studebaker |
Model | J1 | Commander |
Year Released | 1951 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3917 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 111.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3030 mm |