1951 Allard J1 vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1977 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1951 Allard J1. (100 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard J1 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Allard J1 (305 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1951 Allard J1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard J1 | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | J1 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3917 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2480 mm |