1951 Allard J1 vs. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1951 Allard J1. (100 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 444 kg more than 1951 Allard J1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard J1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard J1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard J1 | 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Allard | Daewoo |
| Model | J1 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3917 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4960 mm |
