1951 Allard J1 vs. 2009 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1951 Allard J1. (100 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J1.
Because 1951 Allard J1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard J1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Allard J1 (305 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1951 Allard J1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard J1 | 2009 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | J1 | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3917 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1840 mm |
