1951 Allard J2 vs. 1959 Austin A 40
To start off, 1959 Austin A 40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard J2 (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard J2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard J2 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard J2 | 1959 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Allard | Austin |
| Model | J2 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 26 L |
