1951 Allard J2 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J2 would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1951 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1951 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard J2 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | J2 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 79 L |
