1951 Allard J2 vs. 2002 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2002 MG ZT-T is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1951 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG ZT-T weights approximately 645 kg more than 1951 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard J2 | 2002 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | Allard | MG |
| Model | J2 | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
