1951 Allard J2 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1951 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 500 kg more than 1951 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard J2 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | J2 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |
