1951 Allard J2 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1951 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 877 kg more than 1951 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard J2 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | J2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1857 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |
