1951 Allard K1 vs. 1971 BMW 2002
To start off, 1971 BMW 2002 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1951 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Allard K1 (203 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 1951 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K1 | 1971 BMW 2002 | |
Make | Allard | BMW |
Model | K1 | 2002 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 197 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 77.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |