1951 Allard K1 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1951 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K1 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Allard K1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1951 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K1 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K1 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1951 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |