1951 Allard K1 vs. 1992 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1992 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1951 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Allard K1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1951 Allard K1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K1 | 1992 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K1 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1951 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.9 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2560 mm |