1951 Allard K1 vs. 1993 Alpina B3

To start off, 1993 Alpina B3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Alpina B3 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1951 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Alpina B3 weights approximately 773 kg more than 1951 Allard K1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Alpina B3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Alpina B3 (260 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Allard K1. (203 Nm). This means 1993 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Allard K1.

Compare all specifications: