1951 Allard K1 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard K1 (85 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard K1 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K1 weights approximately 417 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K1 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Allard | MCC |
Model | K1 | Smart |
Year Released | 1951 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1460 mm |