1951 Allard K1 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 793 kg more than 1951 Allard K1.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Allard K1. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K1 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Allard | Jeep |
Model | K1 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2775 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 78 L |