1951 Allard K2 vs. 1950 Allard K1
To start off, 1951 Allard K2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K1 would be higher. Both 1951 Allard K2 and 1950 Allard K1 are equipped with a 3,622 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 85 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 128 kg more than 1950 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 1950 Allard K1 | |
Make | Allard | Allard |
Model | K2 | K1 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |