1951 Allard K2 vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1953 Jeep CJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | K2 | CJ |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2040 mm |
