1951 Allard K2 vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1954 Studebaker Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Studebaker Commander (140 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 225 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
| Make | Allard | Studebaker |
| Model | K2 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3070 mm |
