1951 Allard K2 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1951 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1951 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | K2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3310 mm |
