1951 Allard K2 vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1962 Mazda R 360 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1770 mm |
