1951 Allard K2 vs. 1965 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1965 Maserati Mistral is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Mistral (232 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 45 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1965 Maserati Mistral | |
| Make | Allard | Maserati |
| Model | K2 | Mistral |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3484 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
