1951 Allard K2 vs. 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600
To start off, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 | |
Make | Allard | Alfa Romeo |
Model | K2 | 2600 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |