1951 Allard K2 vs. 1972 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1972 Holden Belmont is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Holden Belmont (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Belmont weights approximately 145 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1972 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Allard | Holden |
| Model | K2 | Belmont |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
