1951 Allard K2 vs. 1972 Volvo 140
To start off, 1972 Volvo 140 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 140 (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 140 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1972 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Allard | Volvo |
| Model | K2 | 140 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
