1951 Allard K2 vs. 1973 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 165 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1973 Chrysler Charger | |
| Make | Allard | Chrysler |
| Model | K2 | Charger |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
