1951 Allard K2 vs. 1977 Chrysler 1610
To start off, 1977 Chrysler 1610 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Chrysler 1610 (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Chrysler 1610 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1977 Chrysler 1610.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 1977 Chrysler 1610 | |
Make | Allard | Chrysler |
Model | K2 | 1610 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |