1951 Allard K2 vs. 1990 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 1990 Mercury Tracer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercury Tracer (109 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Tracer should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 1990 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Allard | Mercury |
Model | K2 | Tracer |
Year Released | 1951 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |