1951 Allard K2 vs. 1992 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Voyager (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 535 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 1992 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Allard | Chrysler |
Model | K2 | Voyager |
Year Released | 1951 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1680 mm |