1951 Allard K2 vs. 1993 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 1993 Ford Mondeo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Mondeo (89 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 150 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1993 Ford Mondeo | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K2 | Mondeo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1751 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |
