1951 Allard K2 vs. 1995 BMW 520
To start off, 1995 BMW 520 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW 520 (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW 520 weights approximately 293 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 1995 BMW 520 | |
Make | Allard | BMW |
Model | K2 | 520 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |