1951 Allard K2 vs. 1997 Dodge Copperhead
To start off, 1997 Dodge Copperhead is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Dodge Copperhead (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Dodge Copperhead should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Dodge Copperhead weights approximately 100 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1997 Dodge Copperhead | |
| Make | Allard | Dodge |
| Model | K2 | Copperhead |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |
