1951 Allard K2 vs. 1998 Mazda 626
To start off, 1998 Mazda 626 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda 626 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1998 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | 626 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |
