1951 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1999 Lancia Zeta is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lancia Zeta (145 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 455 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 1999 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Allard | Lancia |
Model | K2 | Zeta |
Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |