1951 Allard K2 vs. 2000 Audi RS4
To start off, 2000 Audi RS4 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi RS4 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2000 Audi RS4 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | K2 | RS4 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2669 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |