1951 Allard K2 vs. 2000 Tata Indica
To start off, 2000 Tata Indica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 265 kg more than 2000 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2000 Tata Indica | |
| Make | Allard | Tata |
| Model | K2 | Indica |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1404 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
