1951 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1951 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4807 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2950 mm |