1951 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Ford Cougar
To start off, 2001 Ford Cougar is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Cougar weights approximately 84 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2001 Ford Cougar | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1951 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1279 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |