1951 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Ford Urban Explorer
To start off, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Urban Explorer weights approximately 574 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2001 Ford Urban Explorer | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K2 | Urban Explorer |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1769 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2840 mm |
