1951 Allard K2 vs. 2002 Morgan Aero 8
To start off, 2002 Morgan Aero 8 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Morgan Aero 8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Morgan Aero 8 (282 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Morgan Aero 8 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2002 Morgan Aero 8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2002 Morgan Aero 8 | |
Make | Allard | Morgan |
Model | K2 | Aero 8 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2530 mm |