1951 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Audi RS6
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 359 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi RS6 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2004 Audi RS6 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | K2 | RS6 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |