1951 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2004 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar X-Type (192 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 360 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2004 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Allard | Jaguar |
Model | K2 | X-Type |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 192 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |