1951 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (164 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 175 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |