1951 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Omega weights approximately 538 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2004 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Allard | Opel |
| Model | K2 | Omega |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1733 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2840 mm |
