1951 Allard K2 vs. 2005 BMW 316
To start off, 2005 BMW 316 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 316 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2005 BMW 316 | |
| Make | Allard | BMW |
| Model | K2 | 316 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
