1951 Allard K2 vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 671 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Allard | SsangYong |
| Model | K2 | Musso |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1866 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |
