1951 Allard K2 vs. 2005 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2005 Toyota Echo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Echo (115 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Echo should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2005 Toyota Echo.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Echo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2005 Toyota Echo | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | K2 | Echo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2590 mm |