1951 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K2 | 3 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |