1951 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo (105 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2009 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Aveo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |